I know you've been wondering what's happening here in Texas. Hugh got a nasty cold before we left and it seems to be getting better, but we're babying him to make sure. The hospital listened to his lungs yesterday and said he's OK, so at least he hasn't gotten bronchitis (yet).
We're doing OK here. What a complex! We saw our doc yesterday and as we thought from meeting him briefly in NJ, we like him a lot. We asked him everything we wanted to know and he was very helpful in answering in a direct and fully informed way. The doc at UCSF gave some of the same answers, but didn't explain them so that I understood why he felt that way and so I was never comfortable with the answers.
We talked about chemo and he said that the side effects from the chemo are ongoing and long lasting, some are damaging to other parts of the body and while it is effective in some of the people, it is not something we want to do as long as the tumors are operable. The UCSF doc said chemo wasn't worth it at all with these tumors and that's when he lost me. I've read lots of folks on the listserv who have had good response from chemo. But since these tumors ARE operable, at least from the 85% they can see on scans, it is worth having surgery. He also told us that it wouldn't be the same surgery as last time in that they do not expect to cut the intestines, reconnect and have stomach drains when he leaves the hospital. So all of that was reassuring.
In fact, he said that if Hugh continues to have more tumors, and it's very possible, that we could expect him to have an excellent quality of life - just as he is now - even if he has to go have surgeries again and again every 3-4 years. It's do-able. He even told us about a woman who had 13 surgeries over many, many years and THEN, hers just stopped recurring. That's the way these things are.
But he really made me feel so much better and I think Hugh as well, although he had already gotten to the recurring surgeries part and was OK with it. Hugh's case is being presented to the tumor board this afternoon and we're going back to the hospital to hear what they think. Prior to the board meeting, their top radiologist will review all of the CT scans from the very beginning and the pathology dept. will report on the tissue we had forwarded before we came. So we'll see what they recommend.
I think at this point that we're just deciding where & when to have the surgery. The doctor said we have 6-9 months to have the surgery because these are growing so slowly, but we'll do it this year since we've already met all of our out-of-pocket expenses for insurance already. As to where - we can go to UCSF, MD Anderson, or even Mass General or Sloan Kettering or UCLA, but all the others require more travel and consults and we're with one of the country's best experts right here. So at this point we're leaning toward having the surgery here because we're so impressed with the whole place and trust this doctor so much. (Anyone want to buy a photograph?)

Tomorrow morning we're visiting the lab where our doctor's wife is the lead researcher for DTRF trying to find a cause and a cure. She wants to show us the lab and her research. Her assistant even offered to come to the hotel and pick us up! They've been so nice.
So that's it for now. Hotel for hanging out, hospital for lots and lots of waiting, but home tomorrow night - yaay! My brother, sister-in-law & 21-yr old nephew will be here this weekend from Portland. Couldn't be better timing for something great to look forward to. Our oldest grandson started first grade yesterday. We called him and he told us about it and then said, "That's all I remember, is that OK?" LOL! Can't wait to see my kidlets and my fur kids!